process and realityの例文

• Whitehead's 1929 " Process and Reality " contains a good deal of informal mereotopology.
• English mathematician and philosopher Alfred North Whitehead quotes Santayana extensively in his magnum opus " Process and Reality ".
• Whitehead often speaks of the metaphysics of " Process and Reality " as'the philosophy of organism '.
• Today Whitehead's philosophical works  particularly " Process and Reality "  are regarded as the foundational texts of process philosophy.
• In 1927, Alfred North Whitehead gave the Gifford Lectures at the University of Edinburgh, later published as " Process and Reality ."
• Whitehead himself thought highly of William James and John Dewey, and acknowledged his indebtedness to them in the preface to " Process and Reality ".
• Possibly the most influential formulation of a theory of gunky spacetime comes from A . N . Whitehead in his seminal work " Process and Reality ."
• He was influenced by the French philosopher Henri Bergson ( 1859 1941 ), whom he credits along with William James and John Dewey in the preface to " Process and Reality ".
• The cosmology elaborated in " Process and Reality " posits an ontology which is based on the two kinds of existence of entity, that of actual entity and that of abstract entity or abstraction.
• The predicate " SC " enables formalizing the necessary condition given in Whitehead's " Process and Reality " for the mereological sum of two individuals to exist : they must be connected.
• It is clear that Whitehead respected these ideas, as may be seen for example in his 1919 book " An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Natural Knowledge " as well as in " Process and Reality ".
• Starting in 1916, and culminating in his 1929 " Process and Reality ", A . N . Whitehead published several books invoking part whole concepts of varying degrees of formality; see Whitehead's point-free geometry.
• Because it has no finite spatiotemporal extent, a single point of Minkowski space cannot be an occasion of experience, but is an abstraction from an infinite set of overlapping or contained occasions of experience, as explained in " Process and Reality ".
• The fact that it is has been tolerated for this long is just a testament to how far the entire Ireland " collaboration " has strayed from the norms of Wikipedia process and reality in general . talk ) 20 : 06, 4 August 2009 ( UTC)
• The following is an attempt to provide an accessible outline of some of the main ideas in Whitehead's " Process and Reality ", based on the book itself, but guided by a general reading of secondary sources, especially I . Leclerc's " Whitehead's Metaphysics.
• Regarding Whitehead's use of the term, " occasions " in reference to, " God " it is explained in, " Process and Reality Corrected Edition " that "'Actual entities'- also termed'actual occasions'- are the final real things of which the world is made up.
• Whitehead's brief but provocative theological speculations, added almost as an afterthought at the end of his major philosophical opus " Process and Reality " ( 1929 ), were elaborated into an excitingly new natural theology that seemed particularly attractive to Christian theologians because it made naturalistic sense of God's personal love for creatures.
• But even from the purely academic perspective ( which I think is quite narrow here ) if the translation of Whitehead's Process and Reality ( a comparable text to Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, I mean in difficulty ) is nothing and there are thousands of people out there who do similar works ( not to speak about translating from the original Pali or Sanskrit or Vedic sources ), then it is difficult to discuss anything.
• Though " Process and Reality " has been called " arguably the most impressive single metaphysical text of the twentieth century, " it has been little-read and little-understood, partly because it demands  as Isabelle Stengers puts it  " that its readers accept the adventure of the questions that will separate them from every consensus . " Whitehead questioned western philosophy's most dearly held assumptions about how the universe works, but in doing so he managed to anticipate a number of 21st century scientific and philosophical problems and provide novel solutions.